See also Australian douche ad
(ca. 1900) - Fresca
douche powder (U.S.A.) (date ?) - Kotique douche liquid
ad, 1974 (U.S.A.) - Liasan
(1) genital wash ad, 1980s (Germany) - Liasan (2) genital wash
ad, 1980s (Germany) - Lysol
douche liquid ad, 1928 (U.S.A.) - Lysol douche liquid ad,
1948 (U.S.A.) - Marvel
douche liquid ad, 1928 (U.S.A.) - Midol menstrual pain
pill ad, 1938 (U.S.A.) - Midol
booklet (selections), 1959 (U.S.A.) - Mum deodorant cream ad,
1926 (U.S.A.) - Myzone
menstrual pain pills ad, 1952 (Australia) - Pristeen genital spray
ad, 1969 (U.S.A.) - Spalt
pain tablets, 1936 (Germany) - Vionell genital spray ad,
1970, with Cheryl Tiegs (Germany) - Zonite douche liquid ad,
1928 (U.S.A.)
The Perils of Vaginal
Douching (essay by Luci Capo Rome) - the odor page
|
Amolin, The Personal Deodorant Powder, for
menstrual pads
(U.S.A., 1930s?)
Disguising the odor of menstrual
discharge is an important task for
women in America and many other
countries. Not only is it thought objectionable in
itself, the odor lets on that
a woman is
menstruating, a fact which,
for some reason, must be concealed to
avoid shame and discrimination. Menstrual huts,
on the contrary, advertise that women
are menstruating, although they
segregate women. (Read what Prof.
Sally Price says about menstrual
segregation.)
Does our
culture conceal menstruation so that
women are not segregated - at
least for that reason? Why would
menstruation require segregation? Why
does America so dislike body odor? Why
don't I make any money doing this?
Amolin powder - it might be baking
soda - covered many bases in the odor
department: feet,
armpits,
vagina
(by douching with it), menstrual pads,
and, the can says, the whole body,
actually.
In April, 2005, an e-mailer wrote
the following:
Your description says it might
have been baking soda. It may have
had baking soda as a base, but the
deodorizing effect was enhanced by
adding something from the amole
(soap) plant. It was around until
the early 1960s.
Women used it for feminine odor
and men and boys used it for foot
and underarm odor. In the 1950s and
1960s I believe its manufacturer was
Norwich (Pharmaceuticals?).
|
Above: front of
can
See the white paper band,
on the lower part, below
Right: back of
can
|
|
|
The paper
band surrounding
the can. In my capacity
as the director of MUM -
hey, I bought it at auction!
- I opened the band, intact
for maybe 60 years. A bold
move, but how are you gunna
find out what's on the other
side if you don't? You can
sense my guilt. I should
have steamed it open, darn
it!
|
|
|
The inside
of the band; the smaller top
section folded up from
beneath the band.
The woman looks
suspiciously like a nurse.
If so, that would complete
the medical impression
started by the crosses, thus
socking the user in the jaw
with doctor/nurse
credibility, common at that
time and today! Both Kotex
and Modess
used crosses at one time or
another to enhance their
credibility.
|
|
See the Kotex Quest
menstrual pad deodorant
But read what really causes menstrual odor - you won't
like it. See also
Australian douche
ad (ca. 1900)
© 1999, 2005 Harry
Finley. It is illegal to reproduce or
distribute work
on this Web site in any manner or medium
without written permission of the author.
Please report suspected violations to hfinley@mum.org
|